Publications
Stimuli, data, and/or code can be found in the OSF or other repositories.
Stimuli, data, and/or code can be found in the OSF or other repositories.
Ph.D. dissertation
Schoenmakers, G. (2022). Definite objects in the wild: A converging evidence approach to scrambling in the Dutch middle-field. Ph.D. dissertation at Radboud Unversity. https://doi.org/10.48273/LOT0617. [OSF]
Peer-reviewed papers
In preparation/submitted
Schoenmakers, G., Coopmans, C. & de Swart, P. With(out) a trace: Trace reactivation in Dutch A-scrambling. Manuscript accepted as a registered report in Linguistics.
To appear
Schoenmakers, G. & Rojas-Berscia, L.M. (2025). Parasitic gaps and the tense contrast in different varieties of Spanish and French. Isogloss.
2025
Coopmans, C., Ligtenberg, K., Suijkerbuijk, M. & Schoenmakers, G. (2025). Comparing syntactic and discourse accounts of islands and parasitic gaps: Experimental evidence from acceptability judgments. The Linguistic Review 42(2), 139–187. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2025-2005. [OSF]
de Hoop, H., Levshina, N., Sadowski, S. & Schoenmakers, G. (2025). Generalizing or personalizing: Effects of three types of second person pronouns in service ads. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics 14. https://doi.org/10.51751/dujal19032. [RDR]
de Hoop, H. & Schoenmakers, G. (2025). Introduction: Perception and processing of address terms. Languages 10(10), Article 267. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages10100267.
Kovač, I. & Schoenmakers, G. (2025). An experimental-syntactic take on long passive in Dutch: Unraveling the patterns underlying its (un)acceptability. Syntactic Theory and Research 1(1), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.16995/star.17579. [OSF]
Martin, F., Ilić, I., Schoenmakers, G. & Alexiadou, A. (2025). What do children do with do? Superfluous do in child English. Glossa: A journal of general linguistics 10. https://doi.org/10.16995/glossa.10651. [Zenodo]
Schoenmakers, G. (2025). How a simple increase in the number of items can enhance the reliability of linguistic judgments: The case of island experiments. Languages 10(11), Article 277. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages10110277. [OSF]
Schoenmakers, G. & van den Berg, C. (2025). Come city, I am city: Associations with and appreciation of bare spatial predicates from youth Dutch. Taal en Tongval 77(2), 195–224. https://doi.org/10.5117/TET2025.2.003.SCHO. [OSF]
Schoenmakers, G., Opheij, E., de Hoop, H. & Vismans, R. (2025). Forms of address in Caribbean and Surinamese Dutch. In V. Fernandez-Mallat and M. I. Moyna (eds.), Topics in address research: Beyond binaries (pp. 171–196). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tar.6.08sch. [RDR]
2024
Bourdeau, C. & Schoenmakers, G. (2024). Occam’s razor and the “minimal”: The Wolof basic clause. In C. Bourdeau, The Wolof basic clause and its information-structural derivatives (Ph.D. thesis at Radboud University), Chapter 6, 95–119. https://dx.medra.org/10.48273/LOT0659
den Hartog, M., Bras, S. & Schoenmakers, G. (2024). The impact of pronouns of address in job ads from different industries and companies. Languages 9(3), Article 110. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages9030110. [RDR]
den Hartog, M., Sánchez Carrasco, P., Schoenmakers, G., Hogeweg, L. & de Hoop, H. (2024). Processing pronouns of address in a job interview in French and German. Applied Linguistics. Article amae050. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amae050. [RDR]
Sánchez Carrasco, P., van Hoften, M. & Schoenmakers, G. (2024). What I can do with the right version of you: The impact of narrative perspective on reader immersion, and how (in)formal address pronouns influence immersion reports. Languages 9(8), Article 265. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages9080265. [RDR]
Schoenmakers, G., Hachimi, J. & de Hoop, H. (2024). Can you make a difference? The use of (in)formal address pronouns in advertisement slogans. Journal of International Consumer Marketing 36(2). 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2023.2215472. [RDR]
Schoenmakers, G. & van Hout, R. (2024). Consistency and variability in acceptability judgments from naïve native speakers. Nederlandse Taalkunde 29(1), 49–75. http://doi.org/10.5117/NEDTAA2024.1.005.SCHO. [paper]
Schoenmakers, G. & van Hout, R. (2024). Two roads diverged in a linguistic wood, and we have to travel both. Nederlandse Taalkunde 29(1), 82–88. http://doi.org/10.5117/NEDTAA2024.1.007.SCHO. [paper]
Schoenmakers, G. & Stoica, I. (2024). An experimental investigation of wh-dependencies in four island types in Romanian. Glossa: A journal for general linguistics 9. https://doi.org/10.16995/glossa.15193. [OSF]
Stoica, I. & Schoenmakers, G. (2024). Interrogative islands in Romanian. In A. Sevcenco, I. Stoica, I. Stoicescu, A. Tigău, V. Tomescu, and M. Tănase-Dogaru (eds.), Exploring linguistic landscapes: A Festschrift for Larisa Avram and Andrei Avram (pp. 163–189). Bucharest University Press. [OSF]
2023
Schoenmakers, G. (2023). Linguistic judgments in 3D: The aesthetic quality, linguistic acceptability, and surface probability of stigmatized and non-stigmatized variation. Linguistics 61(3), 779–824. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2021-0179. [RDR]
Struik, T. & Schoenmakers, G. (2023). When information structure exploits syntax: The relation between scrambling and the loss of VO. Journal of Linguistics 59(3), 655–690. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226722000172.
2022
den Hartog, M., van Hoften, M. & Schoenmakers, G. (2022). Pronouns of address in recruitment advertisements from multinational companies. In J. Vogel & S. Leufkens (Eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 39 (pp. 42–57). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.00060.har. [OSF]
Mulder, G., Schoenmakers, G., Hoenselaar, O. & de Hoop, H. (2022). Tense and aspect in a Spanish literary work and its translations. Languages 7(3), Article 217. Special issue on Tense and Aspect Across Languages. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7030217.
Mulder, G., Schoenmakers, G. & de Hoop, H. (2022). The influence of first and second language on the acquisition of pragmatic markers in Spanish: Evidence from an experimental study. Isogloss 8(1). Article 11. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/isogloss.212. [RDR]
Schoenmakers, G. & Foolen, A. (2022). At the margins of grammar: Dutch and German verb particles in first sentence position. Nederlandse Taalkunde 27(3), 368–393. https://doi.org/10.5117/NEDTAA2022.3.004.SCHO.
Schoenmakers, G., Poortvliet, M. & Schaeffer, J. (2022). Topicality and anaphoricity in Dutch scrambling. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 40(2), 541–571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-021-09516-z. [OSF: Ch. 4]
Schoenmakers, G., Redl, T., Collin, S., Versendaal, R., de Swart, P. & de Hoop, H. (2022). Processing mismatching gendered possessive pronouns in L1 Dutch and L2 French. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics 11. https://doi.org/10.51751/dujal9948. [Supplementary material]
2021
Schoenmakers, G. & Storment, J.D. (2021). Going city: Directional predicates and preposition incorporation in youth vernaculars of Dutch. In: M. Dingemanse, E. van Lier & J. Vogels (Eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 38 (pp. 65–80). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.00050.sch. [OSF]
2020
Coopmans, C. & G. Schoenmakers, G. (2020). Incremental structure building of preverbal PPs in Dutch. In: E. Tribushinina & M. Dingemanse (Eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 37 (pp. 38–52). John Benjamins. http://doi.org/10.1075/avt.00036.coo. [OSF]
Schoenmakers, G. (2020). Freedom in the Dutch middle-field: Deriving discourse structure at the syntax-pragmatics interface. Glossa: A journal for general linguistics 5, Article 114. http://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.1307. [OSF: Ch. 3]
2019
Schoenmakers, G. & de Swart, P. (2019). Adverbial hurdles in Dutch scrambling. In A. Gattnar, R. Hörnig, M. Störzer, & S. Featherston (Eds.), Proceedings of Linguistic Evidence 2018: Experimental data drives linguistic theory (pp. 124–145). University of Tübingen. http://doi.org/10.15496/publikation-32627. [OSF: Ch. 2]
Non-peer-reviewed papers
2024
Schoenmakers, G. & van den Berg, C. (2024) ‘Ik ben stad’. Onze Taal 2024 (4), 30–31. [link]
2018
Schoenmakers, G. & Piepers, J. (2018). Echter kan het wel! Levende Talen Magazine 105(4), 10–13. [pdf]
Schoenmakers, G., Postema, M. & Stärk, K. (2018). Stappenplan voor een nieuwe taal: Hoe creëer je een kunsttaal als het Dothraki of het Esperanto? NEMO Kennislink [link]; included in Dutch teaching method Op Niveau in 2024, ThiemeMeulenhoff.